Contextual determinants of family-driven care implementation in juvenile justice settings

Health & Justice

Table 4 Model building for outcome 2: family-driven strategies (N = 140)

	Model 1 (Primary Predictors)	Model 2 (Full Model)	Model 3 (Reduced ^b)	Model 3 (Parsimonious ^c)
Fixed Effects^a	β (SE)	β (SE)	β (SE)
Relative Advantage	0.02 (0.07)	0.003 (0.07)
Complexity	-0.11 (0.06)	-0.08 (0.06)	-0.10 (0.06)
Negative Attitudes	-0.001 (0.09)	-0.03 (0.10)
Culture	0.01 (0.08)	0.01 (0.08)
Compatibility	0.03 (0.08)	0.07 (0.09)
Relative Priority	0.25 (0.08)**	0.25 (0.08)**	0.28 (0.06)***	0.31 (0.06)***
Access to Knowledge	0.01 (0.07)	0.05 (0.08)
Leadership Engagement	0.19 (0.09)*	0.21 (0.09)*	0.22 (0.08)**	0.22 (0.08)**
Available Resources	0.03 (0.08)	0.02 (0.08)
External Partnerships	0.12 (0.06)	0.10 (0.06)	0.12 (0.06)*	0.12 (0.06)*
Graduate Education		0.001 (0.12)
Years with Agency
<5 years		0.10 (0.13)
Between 5–10 years		-0.13 (0.12)
10 + years		Ref
Role
Leadership		-0.28 (0.19)	-0.21 (0.16)	-0.23 (0.16)
Behavioral/Social Provider		-0.31 (0.18)	-0.23 (0.14	-0.23 (0.14)
Case Manager		-0.20 (0.15)*	-0.31 (0.14)*	-0.35 (0.14)*
Educator		-0.41 (0.23)	-0.23 (0.14)	-0.24 (0.14)
Line Staff		Ref	Ref	Ref
Agency Type
Administrative		0.06 (0.29)
Detention		0.18 (0.21)
Community Supervision		Ref

Note: *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001; Estimates based on Generalized Linear Mixed Model with random intercept, adjusted for other variables in the model
^a Variables with p < 0.25 in the unadjusted models (Table 2), were included in the model-building process
^b Removed variables with p > 0.25 from full model
^c Only includes significant variables at p < 0.05 level
ICC: 10% of the variability in the outcome is at the agency level

ISSN: 2194-7899