Skip to main content

Table 2 Police chief responses (n = 276) to addiction and policing items

From: Beliefs of US chiefs of police about substance use disorder, fentanyl exposure, overdose response, and use of discretion: results from a national survey

Item (lower anchor/upper anchor)

Item n (%)

Response n (%), or Health n (%)-Safety n (%)

1

1–3

4

5–7

7

1. Officer discretion in arrest (not at discretion/at discretion)a

276 (100%)

3 (2.1%)-5 (3.8%)

14 (9.8%)-18 (13.5%)

21 (14.7%)-23 (17.3%)

108 (75.5%)-92 (69.2%)

32 (22.4%)-34 (25.6%)

2. Officer trust in arrest (strongly disagree/strongly agree)b

275 (99.6%)

1 (0.7%)-1 (0.8%)

3 (2.1%)-3 (2.3%)

7 (4.9%)-1 (0.7%)

132 (93.0%)-129 (97.0%)

57 (40.1%)-70 (52.6%)

3. Effective opioid overdose response (strongly disagree/strongly agree)

276 (100%)

0 (0.0%)

12 (4.3%)

22 (8.0%)

242 (87.7%)

77 (27.9%)

4. Effective methamphetamine overdose response (strongly disagree/strongly agree)

276 (100%)

3 (1.1%)

28 (10.1%)

46 (16.7%)

202 (73.2%)

46 (16.7%)

5. Interest in methamphetamine de-escalation (strongly disagree/strongly agree)

260 (94.2%)

3 (1.2%)

7 (2.7%)

19 (7.3%)

234 (90.0%)

97 (37.3%)

6. Officer risk of fentanyl exposure (strongly disagree/strongly agree)

273 (98.9%)

7 (2.6%)

12 (4.4%)

12 (4.4%)

249 (91.2%)

152 (55.7%)

7. Reason for illegal use of buprenorphine (strongly disagree/strongly agree)c

154 (55.6%)

3 (3.3%)-6 (9.4%)

11 (12.2%)-9 (14.1%)

24 (26.7%)-14 (21.9%)

55 (61.1%)-41 (64.1%)

12 (13.3%)-11 (17.2%)

  

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th

6th

8. Rank substance (most harmful/least harmful)d, e

       

 Cocaine

272 (98.6%)

1 (0.7%)-3 (2.3%)

6 (4.3%)-14 (10.6%)

25 (17.9%)-22 (16.7%)

43 (30.7%)-47 (35.6%)

51 (36.4%)-38 (28.8%)

14 (10.0%)-8 (6.1%)

 Heroin/fentanyl/opioids

272 (98.6%)

80 (57.1%)-69 (52.3%)

29 (20.7%)-33 (25.0%)

14 (10.0%)-17 (12.9%)

12 (8.6%)-9 (6.8%)

1 (1.4%)-2 (1.5%)

3 (2.1%)-2 (1.5%)

 Alcohol

271 (98.2%)

26 (18.6%)-27 (20.8%)

30 (21.4%)-16 (12.2%)

36 (25.7%)-29 (22.0%)

14 (10.0%)-15 (11.5%)

20 (14.3%)-19 (14.5%)

14 (10.0%)-24 (18.5%)

 Methamphetamine

271 (98.2%)

28 (20.0%)-33 (25.2%)

56 (40.0%)-51 (38.9%)

28 (20.0%)-20 (15.3%)

13 (9.3%)-10 (7.6%)

8 (5.7%)-8 (6.1%)

7 (5.0%)-9 (6.9%)

 Cannabis

272 (98.6%)

5 (3.4%)-3 (2.3%)

10 (7.1%)-9 (6.8%)

14 (10.0%)-13 (9.9%)

23 (16.4%)-23 (17.4%)

16 (11.4%)-29 (22.0%)

72 (51.4%)-55 (41.7%)

 Crack cocaine

272 (98.6%)

1 (0.7%)-2 (1.5%)

11 (7.9%)-9 (6.8%)

21 (15.0%)-32 (24.2%)

36 (25.7%)-30 (22.7%)

39 (27.9%)-25 (18.9%)

32 (22.9%)-34 (25.8%)

  1. * denotes significance at P < 0.01
  2. ** denotes significance at P < 0.05
  3. a One arm referred to the arrested individual as a “person” and the other as a “drug user”
  4. b One arm referred to the arrested individual as a “person” and the other as a “drug user”
  5. c One arm referred to illicit use as intending “to manage their opioid addiction on their own“ and the other as intending “to get high with a less dangerous drug than heroin or fentanyl“
  6. d One arm asked participants to rank the substance in its “relative harms to the community you serve” and the other in its “relative threat to the safety of the community you serve”
  7. e There were no statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) by health or safety frame for the framed questions