Table 1 Jail characteristics
From: Cost analysis of MOUD implementation and sustainability in Massachusetts jails
Model 1: Contract for Methadone Maintenance | Model 2: Contract for All Induction & Maintenance | Model 3: Jail OTP Certification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site A | Site B | Site C | Site D | Site E | Site F | |
Average Daily Population | > 600 | > 300 | > 1,000 | > 1,000 | > 150 | > 125 |
Switched MOUD Program Type During Implementation | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES |
Setting* Economic Research Service U.S. (n.d.) | Major Metro* | Major Metro* | Major Metro* | Large Metro** | Nonmetro*** | Small Metro**** |
Monthly Average Number of those who Screen Positive for an OUD | 146 | 101 | 392 | 236 | 56 | 13 |
Monthly Average Number of Patients Receiving MOUD | ||||||
Methadone | 19 | 11 | 21 | 48 | 21 | 6 |
Buprenorphine | 32 | 26 | 44 | 75 | 11 | 6 |
Extended-Release Naltrexone | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Total Monthly Average Number of Patients Receiving MOUD | 56 | 38 | 68 | 125 | 34 | 13 |
Annual Average of Patients Receiving MOUD | 672 | 456 | 816 | 1500 | 408 | 156 |