Theme | Categories by State | ||
---|---|---|---|
CT | CA | IL | |
1 (Communities /CBOs) | Access to and benefits from the policy are unequal across different types of organizations | Coordinated efforts to provide training and technical assistance to CBOs and providers. Barriers for community-based organizations | Frustration and mistrust among communities and community-based organizations Efforts to streamline training, billing, and certification |
2 (Design) | Ensure success during early implementation before expanding the policy | Designing and amending the policy | A team-based approach to delivering services under the policy Policy in need of revision from the date of passage |
3 (Collaboration) | Passage of “the policy” as the culmination of multi-level, intentional, and collaborative work between stakeholders. Stakeholder inclusivity in designing and implementing the legislation and policy Managing relationships between stakeholders | Collaborative policy work group | |
4 (Context) | Small state size as a positive asset to implementation | Unique implementation context | |
5 (Momentum) | Locating, building, and capitalizing on policy momentum | Quick passage of the policy legislation as a double-edged sword Cyclical/inefficient funding disrupts ground-level violence intervention work | |
6 (Framing) | Establishing a common purpose, vision, and benefit to stakeholders and constituents Consistent, high-level statewide messaging and strategy | Framing the root issue Framing the policy |